MicroHorror

December 22, 2008

NEWS: December 22, 2008: How Not to Impress Me

Gentle readers and not-so-gentle readers:

I’m still running about a week behind on submissions, and I apologize. What I need is a new machine to replace this antique laptop. Thank you all for your patience and understanding.

Speaking of patience and understanding, or rather lack of same, I’d like to lay bare some of the ugliness I’ve encountered as an editor, just so you folks can know what things are like on this side of the desk and know how grateful I am that the vast majority of you are smart, sensible, rational people. Follow the jump below, and read this exchange of e-mails from the past couple of days. Identifying information has been deleted, but otherwise all quoted text is verbatim.

A couple of days ago, I received a submission from an author who had never submitted to MicroHorror before. I ran a word count, discovered that the story exceeded the 666-word limit, and informed her of this. She then submitted another story which did fit within the limit, but it was in desperate need of proofreading and editing. Typos were everywhere and the punctuation was simply awful. I replied with the following:

I’m sorry; the story requires more editing and proofreading before it
can be published on MicroHorror. It is not publishable in its current
state. Thank you for your submission.

Nathan Rosen
Founder & Editor, MicroHorror.com

Was I more curt than necessary? Perhaps I was; I was tired and grouchy, and I didn’t feel like cleaning up someone else’s punctuation mess. Nevertheless, I don’t think I deserved this response:

It is fine the way it is, you just don’t understand experimental fiction, I will send it to a paying market. Congratulations, you just passed on an original [NAME REDACTED]. Remember that, might even make you a footnote in literary history, though I doubt it, at least in your case. P.S. maybe you just don’t like stories by female writers, some men feel threatened.
[NAME]

I don’t like being insulted, but I know people can get hot under the collar. I decided that the situation called for a more complete explanation of my decision as well as some self-defense, and maybe the whole thing could be defused.

Dear Ms. [NAME]:

On the contrary. First, I refute your charge of misogyny, and as
evidence point out the large number of female contributors to
MicroHorror, as well as the fact that all three winners of the 2008
MicroHorror story contest were written by women. I believe that the
charge of my not liking stories by female writers can be safely
dismissed as groundless.

Ms. [NAME], I rejected “[TITLE]” because it was rife with typographical
and grammatical errors. The punctuation, in particular, was atrocious.
I understand that mistakes occur and that nobody is perfect, and I
regularly make small corrections to submissions before publishing
them. However, when a submission is as riddled with errors as
“[TITLE],” I am forced to deem it not worth my time and return it to
the author for correction. I assure you that no self-respecting
publisher would print a story in that condition.

This is a particular shame because I quite liked the premise and
thrust of “[TITLE].” The narrative structure was very well executed,
and I would have been pleased to publish it if it had not required so
much proofreading.

If you wish to correct the story and bring it to a publishable state,
I hope you will again consider MicroHorror as a venue.

Sincerely,
Nathan Rosen
Founder & Editor, MicroHorror.com

And what do I get for my time? I get this:

the ‘errors in punctuation’ are nothing of the sort, they are part of a new way of telling a story, you are just not getting it. Most of my stories written under another name and utilizing the exact same sort of punctuation are still being reprinted and reprinted since the 1980’s. These stories were published all over the world, what stories have were written that were internationally published, Mr. Rosen? You just don’t get it, you never will, and you don’t even pay anything for publication anyway, so, fuck you. P.S. you may well publish female writers, I am guessing that is the closest you have ever been , or will ever be to a female. You will see this story and others of mine published by more progressive mags, this is your loss not mine. I will not consider you as a venue in future, get off your high horse, sonny, try not to trip over your ego when you do.
[NAME]

I haven’t replied to this latest missive, and I doubt I will. You can’t win an argument against an unreasonable bully, and when it looks like an unreasonable bully, walks like an unreasonable bully and quacks like an unreasonable bully, that’s probably what you’re dealing with. Now, in all fairness, who knows? Maybe she’s right. (About the quality of her fiction, I mean; not about my sexual history, as my wife can attest.) Perhaps one day she’ll be raking in the millions and doing guest spots on Oprah, and I’ll still be sitting here, editing MicroHorror with one hand while I eat a Snyder’s of Hanover sourdough hard pretzel with the other. (Best pretzels in the United States. Seriously.) Life is full of mistakes, mine probably even more than most, and maybe I missed the chance to hitch my chariot to a rising star.

I doubt it, though. I have a strong suspicion that this particular writer’s attitude will hold her back far more than her writing skills propel her forward. MicroHorror contributors, I thank you, each and every one of you, for treating me as kindly as you have. This site couldn’t exist if I didn’t like you.

17 Comments »

  1. Oh goodness.
    She just needs to get over herself……. :)

    Comment by Loribeth215 — December 23, 2008 @ 2:54 am

  2. I agree. Her ego far outshines her “talent.” If she was a true professional, she would brush off the rejection and find a more suitable market. It’s just poor professionalism to fire off nasty emails just because an editor doesn’t like your story.

    Comment by TonySmith — December 23, 2008 @ 6:42 am

  3. There’s a story to be written in there somewhere…

    Comment by run21lt — December 23, 2008 @ 8:20 am

  4. And to think one day she might marry some poor chap! Men beware.

    Comment by Nick Allen — December 23, 2008 @ 1:40 pm

  5. She’s not a horror writer. She’s a horror story!

    Comment by zapata — December 23, 2008 @ 2:16 pm

  6. Obvioiusly she hasn’t bothered to explore the site much, because if she would she would’ve seen the numerous (and wonderful) female writers on this site and would not have made such an ignorant statement. most writers can be mature and can take rejection but this is obviously someone of little intelligence who needs to feel self important. It’s a good thing you didn’t respond a third time, she’s obviously eager to waste your time with more of her stupidity.
    Above all it’s your site and your decision what to post here, so…arguing isn’t gonna get her anywhere anyways.
    Ave!

    Comment by MydCelestia666 — December 23, 2008 @ 5:59 pm

  7. She called you “Sonny”. Things don’t get much more psychotic than that!

    Comment by cthulhuyou — December 26, 2008 @ 7:59 pm

  8. This just boggles my mind. It’s almost like a prank… or someone forgot their meds. I can’t imagine what other editors must think of this “author”.

    Comment by Adrian Ludens — December 31, 2008 @ 12:31 am

  9. Ogh, take no notice of her, Nathan! We dead-beats will just stick thegether so we will, and eat pretzels and shave and bathe only when necessary and make really bad editorial decisions - like we editorial people do. Let us celebrate outmoded concepts like punctuation, spelling and grammar. Let us embrace tradiitions such as decency and gentleness and let us kick the shit out of anyone who abuses our friends.

    Did you say I was a woman by the way? My gosh! How flattering ;)

    How big a coffin will this great ego need, I wonder? Bigger than mine, I dare say…

    Comment by Oonah V Joslin — January 1, 2009 @ 9:01 pm

  10. I’m…um…what?

    A…new way of writing…a story?

    Okay, back up a second.

    Did I miss the memo where all of the poet laureates of the 20th century declared that atrocious punctuation and typographical errors are, in fact, some GROUNDBREAKING new way of writing that I was unaware of?

    Jesus christ, I’d better start editing my existing works with “mistakes” before they become outdated!

    Comment by Trihan — January 5, 2009 @ 7:37 pm

  11. As Ann of yore would say: She needs to wake up & smell the coffee!!!! (do wake up, dearie, for your own sake) :)

    Comment by boohoohoo — January 10, 2009 @ 10:07 am

  12. I would take a rejection letter like that as a compliment. You’re basically saying edit it and you’ve got a shot. I’ve had rejection letters where it sounds as if the editor is talking about a different story. Still, you just have to move on.

    Comment by joshua scribner — February 24, 2009 @ 4:40 pm

  13. She is sooo full of herself. She doesn’t even try to see her mistakes. Why didn’t she just corrected what was wrong and then sent it again? I guess she prefers to bully though…

    Comment by Enigma — April 1, 2009 @ 1:42 am

  14. God help her.

    Comment by arbraun — May 9, 2009 @ 1:25 pm

  15. Egos: writer v editor or writer v writer, here’s a classic from Scott Fitzgerald to rival Ernest Hemingway poking jealous fun at Papa’s macho image as the hard-drinking, fast writing sportsman:

    “I hear …that you have finished a novel a hundred thousand words long consisting entirely of the word “balls” used in new groupings…”

    Comment by mikewhitney — June 6, 2009 @ 9:54 am

  16. That makes me laugh! I’m embarrassed for her. I wonder why she would submit to a non-paying market if she’s been doing this since the 1980’s? I’m pretty sure we all (well, most of us) get better the more we write. Yes? I for one am glad Nathan doesn’t publish stories with such errors. They may be short stories but I’d rather not waste my time with such sloppiness. What a disgrace!

    Comment by drscottrocks — June 30, 2009 @ 11:38 am

  17. Although she did give you a brutal word-whipping responding in the way you did invites hostility. people who cannot take rejections and email you back with a snappy letter should be ignored as is expected of a professional editor you sent me a rejection commenting on my skill, not about my proof reading or anything despite the fact my work has been published on paying venues so your comments about my skill as a writer are “unfounded” as you put it. sorry Nathan but despite what your fans say they are far from unbiased, you do have an ego.

    Comment by WCarmstrong — September 21, 2009 @ 12:10 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Home | All Stories by Title | List of All Authors | FAQs and Submission Rules | Links

Powered by WordPress